Which Is Better, A Health Care System With Good Care That U Have 2 Buy Or Poor Medical Care Someone Else Pays4?
Thursday, August 6, 2009, 12:56
Personally I rather have Good care that I have to pay, than poor care that is free. Think FREE CLINIC
You can follow any responses to this entry through the
RSS 2.0 feed.
twcystsa said on Thursday, August 6, 2009, 17:58
Well right now we have neither. Here’s an idea – use a government option while you’re relatively young and healthy. Something that will cover routine doctors visits, checkups, well-woman, childbirth, etc… But also invest in a Health Savings Account throughout your life so when you’re older and you have more medical needs, you can supplement the public option with a higer cost plan designed for the elderly.
It doesn’t have to be ONLY government or ONLY private.
Felonius Monkey said on Thursday, August 6, 2009, 20:25
Or a health care system in wich everybody pays and everybody gets treated and no one is rejected.
delina_m said on Thursday, August 6, 2009, 23:37
CANADIAN HEALTH CARE IS CHEAPER & BETTER
dothe research before your open you big mouth
GopObstr said on Friday, August 7, 2009, 5:00
FIRST OPTION FOR THE RICH AND SECOND OPTION FOR THE POOR.
Sami H said on Friday, August 7, 2009, 10:29
I like having choices, so I do not mind paying for my own care.
Thomas D said on Friday, August 7, 2009, 16:09
They system with good care is the best IF you can afford it. If you can’t afford it – it isn’t the best.
PJ said on Friday, August 7, 2009, 22:34
How about one that combines the two? That sounds like an excellent compromise.